AUTHORS
Regina M. Myers, MD, Yimei Li, PhD2, Caroline Diorio, MD3, Lucy E. Cain, MBBS FRACP4, Hongyan Liu, PhD5, Renee Girbau6, Allison Barz Leahy, MD, MSCE7, Laura Shinehouse8, Diane Baniewicz9, Colleen Callahan, NP10, Lisa Eidenschink Brodersen, PhD11, Joseph Fraietta, PhD12, Vanessa Gonzalez13, Stephen P. Hunger, MD14, Kaylyn Utley Lyons, MD15, Shannon L. Maude, MD16, Susan Rheingold, MD17, Mackenzie Stewart18, Sarah Tasian, MD19, Gerald Wertheim, MD, PhD20, Lisa Wray21, Noelle Frey, MD, MSCE22, Amanda DiNofia, MD23, Stephan A Grupp, MD, PhD24
AFFILIATIONS
1 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
2 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
3 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
4 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
5 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
6 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
7 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
8 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
9 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
10 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
11 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
12 University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
13 University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
14 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
15 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
16 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
17 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
18 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
19 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
20 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
21 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
22 University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
23 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
24 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Relapse of B-ALL after CD19 CAR T cells (CART19) is predominantly driven by antigen escape or inadequate CAR T cell persistence. We hypothesized that co-infusing CD22 CAR T cells (CART22-65s) with humanized CART19 (huCART19) could counter both mechanisms of CART19 failure. We report interim Phase 1/2 trial results using this dual-targeted strategy (NCT05674175).
Methods: Patients <30 years with relapse after prior CART19 (retreatment cohort) or no prior CART19 exposure (CAR-naïve cohort) received co-infused CART22-65s and huCART19 after fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion. The initial dose (DL1) was 2x106 CAR T cells/kg of each product. Higher rates of severe immune effector cell-associated HLH-like syndrome (IEC-HS) prompted a reduction in the CART22-65s dose to 0.5x106 CAR T cells/kg (DL-1). Phase 1 assessed safety, while phase 2 assessed the complete remission rate (CR). Secondary endpoints included relapse-free survival (RFS; relapse defined as ≥0.01% marrow blasts or extramedullary disease [EMD]), overall survival (OS) and CAR T cell expansion and persistence.
Results: From March 2023 to April 2026, 46 patients were infused (DL1, n=27; DL-1, n=19). The retreatment cohort (n=35) was highly refractory: 57% were aged ≥18 years, 57% were in ≥3rd relapse, 31% had prior hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), inotuzumab, blinatumomab, and CART19, and 46% had ≥5% blasts or EMD at infusion. The CAR-naïve cohort (n=11) was younger (55% <13 years), mostly in 1st relapse (82%), and had lower disease burden (18% ≥5% blasts).
In vivo cellular kinetics by qPCR demonstrated robust expansion of both CARTs: huCART19 peaked at day 10 (median 30,357 copies/mg DNA) while CART22-65 peaked at day 21 (187,174 copies/mg DNA at DL1, 35,415 at DL-1). These kinetics aligned with distinct toxicity events. CRS clustered around huCART19 expansion, whereas a 2nd CRS event or IEC-HS aligned with CART22-65s expansion. CRS occurred in 30 (65%) patients (grade 3-4, 7.5%) and ICANS in 1 patient (grade 3).
IEC-HS was frequent at DL1, occurring in 13/27 (48%) patients, with grade 3-4 events in 5 (21%). IEC-HS rates decreased after the CART22-65s dose reduction, with 4/19 (21%) developing IEC-HS and no grade ≥3 events. Median onset was day 23 (IQR 14-28) and median duration was 28 days (IQR 19-33). Laboratory correlates of IEC-HS occurrence and severity included elevated ferritin, LDH, CXCL9, IFNγ, and IL-18. Eight patients received IEC-HS directed therapy, including anakinra (n=7), corticosteroids (n=4), emapalumab (n=4), ruxolitinib (n=3), eculizumab (n=3), cytosorb (n=1) and/or camoteskimab (n=1). Cyclophosphamide 1.5g/m2 was administered to a patient with grade 4 IEC-HS complicated by multisystem organ failure, resulting in complete resolution of symptoms and transient CART ablation. HuCART19 then re-expanded at 5 weeks without recurrent toxicity while CART22-65s remained undetectable. The patient remains in CR with huCART19 persistence for >1 year.
All patients were evaluable for response. At day 28, measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative CR rates by flow cytometry were 89% (31/35) in the retreatment and 100% (11/11) in the CAR-naïve cohort. With a median follow-up of 20 months, 2 year OS and RFS were 69% (95% CI 53-90) and 54% (95% CI 38-78) in the retreatment cohort compared with 100% (95% CI 100) and 89% (95% CI 71-100) in the CAR-naïve cohort. Six patients underwent consolidative HCT. Among 14 relapses, 9 were CD19+/CD22+ and 5 were CD19-/CD22+, 4 of which had evidence of CD19 downregulation pre-infusion.
Functional persistence was evaluated using competing risks analysis of time to B cell recovery (BCR) or CD19+/CD22+ relapse. At 6 months post-infusion, the cumulative incidence of BCR was 30% (95% CI 16-47) in the retreatment and 30% (95% CI 6-59) in the CAR-naïve cohort. Despite distinct early expansion profiles, qPCR measurements of CAR transgenes from months 2-12 demonstrated largely parallel persistence of both CARs.
Conclusions: Dual-targeting with co-infused CART22-65s and huCART19 is an effective salvage therapy in children and young adults with B-ALL refractory to prior CART19 and multiple cellular/immunotherapies. Early outcomes in CAR-naïve patients are also encouraging. Reducing the CART22-65s dose improved safety, with no grade ≥3 IEC-HS events at DL-1. Ongoing follow-up focuses on long-term dual-CAR T cell persistence and optimization of IEC-HS prevention and management strategies.
DISCLOSURES
Regina M. Myers, MD: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.