AUTHORS
Lynda M. Vrooman, MD, Yael Flamand, MS2, Melissa A. Burns, MD3, Victoria B. Koch, BS4, Marian H. Harris, MD, PhD5, Peter D. Cole, MD6, Lisa M. Gennarini, M.7, Nobuko Hijiya, MD8, Justine M. Kahn, MD, MS9, Kara M Kelly, MD10, Caroline Laverdiere, MD11, Bruno Michon, MD12, Andrew E. Place, MD, PhD13, Thai Hoa Tran, MD14, Jennifer J.G. Welch, MD15, Sarah M. Cronholm16, Sarah K. Hunt, MPH17, Donna Neuberg, ScD18, Stephen E. Sallan, MD19, Lewis B. Silverman, MD20
AFFILIATIONS
1 Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
2 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
3 Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
4 Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
5 Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
6 Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
7 Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, United States
8 Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
9 Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
10 Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, University at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, New York, United States
11 CHU Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
12 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Québec, Québec City, Quebec, Canada
13 Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
14 CHU Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
15 Hasbro Children’s Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
16 Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
17 Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
18 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
19 Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
20 Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
ABSTRACT
Background: Advances in outcomes for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have been made by incorporating leukemia biology and minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment to inform risk-adapted treatment. Novel features of DFCI 16-001 included: Low Risk (LR) patients (pts) received no anthracycline, pts 10-14.99 years (yrs) of age without other High Risk (HR) features were treated as LR, IKZF1 deletion was incorporated as a very high risk (VHR) feature, and intensity of therapy was adjusted during Induction based on biology results.
Methods: Pts aged 1 to < 22 yrs with newly diagnosed ALL were eligible for DFCI 16-001. Pts with B-ALL were assigned a Provisional (Prov) Risk Group at diagnosis. Prov LR was defined as age <15 yrs, WBC <50,000/μL, and not CNS-3; Prov HR included all others. Centrally reviewed biology results from diagnostic marrow established Initial Risk Group during Induction. Pts with any of the following were assigned to Initial VHR: IKZF1 deletion, KMT2A-rearrangement (KMT2A-r), low hypodiploidy, or TCF3::HLF fusion. Pts with iAMP21 and Prov HR pts without VHR biology were assigned to Initial HR; all others were assigned to Initial LR. Pts with BCR::ABL1 were removed from protocol by day 15. Intensity of Induction therapy was stratified by Initial Risk Group (3-drug for Initial LR, 4-drug for Initial HR/VHR). Induction Failure (IF) was defined as M3 marrow at end of the first month of therapy (TP1), or M2/M3 marrow after 10 weeks (TP2). For pts achieving complete remission (CR), Final Risk Group was assigned: 1) Final LR: Initial LR with low TP1 MRD (<10-4); 2) Final Intermediate Risk (IR): Initial HR and low TP1 MRD; 3) Final HR: Initial LR or HR with high TP1 MRD but low TP2 MRD (<10-3), 4) Final VHR: adverse biology regardless of MRD or high TP2 MRD (≥10-3). Final LR pts received no anthracycline. Final VHR pts received 2 intensified chemotherapy cycles added to HR backbone. Total duration of treatment was 24 months from CR. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. EFS was modeled univariately and adjusted in multivariable models with the Cox proportional hazards model.
Results: Between 2017-2022, 462 eligible Ph-negative B-ALL pts enrolled. Of these, 343 were classified as Prov LR and 119 Prov HR. After biology results became available (Day 11 of induction), 285 (60.5%) were classified as Initial LR, 96 (21.7%) as Initial HR, and 81 (17.8%) as Initial VHR. Of 455 pts evaluable for Induction events, 452 (99.3%) achieved CR; 1 Initial LR and 2 Initial VHR pts experienced IF. There were no deaths in Induction. 442 pts were assigned a Final Risk Group, 212 (48.0%) Final LR, 74 (16.7%) Final IR, 76 (17.2%) Final HR, and 80 (18.1%) Final VHR (57 for IKZF1 deletion, 8 KMT2A-r, 7 hypodiploidy, 1 TCF3::HLF fusion, 7 for high TP2 MRD). Treatment related mortality (TRM) in CR occurred in 2 pts (0.4%). With 5.1-yr median follow-up, 5-yr OS was 95.5% (95% CI 93.0%, 97.1%) and EFS was 89.2% (85.9%, 91.8%). 5-yr EFS was 95.0% for Final LR, 84.4% for IR, 89.2% for HR, and 80.3% for VHR (p=0.002). Among Final LR pts, for those <10 yrs of age, 5-yr EFS was 96.3%, and for 10-14.99 yrs was 89.5%. 5-yr EFS was 91.3% for pts with Low TP1 MRD (N=332), 86.2% for High TP1/Low TP2 (N=97), and 51.9% for High TP2 (N=13) (p<0.0001). LR pts with TP1 MRD <10-6 had 5-yr EFS 96.3% (vs. 94.2% for LR pts with MRD 10-6 to <10-4, p=0.45). LR pts with TP1 MRD <10-6 and ETV6::RUNX1 or high hyperdiploidy with trisomy 4 and 10 had 5-yr EFS 100%. Pts with IKZF1 deletion had 5-yr EFS of 82.6%; excluding pts with ERG deletion/DUX4-rearrangement, 5-yr EFS was 80.4%. Univariate prognostic factors included age, WBC at diagnosis, MRD at TP1 and TP2, IKZF1 deletion, ETV6::RUNX1, and high hyperdiploidy with trisomy 4 and 10. On multivariable analysis age ≥10 yrs, WBC ≥50,000/μL, and high TP2 MRD were significant predictors for adverse outcome.
Conclusion: Conducted prior to the routine use of blinatumomab in frontline therapy, DFCI 16-001 achieved a favorable EFS and OS for Ph-negative B-ALL pts, with very low TRM. LR pts had 5-yr EFS of 95.0% with an anthracycline-free regimen; VHR pts had EFS of 80.3% with intensified therapy, although those with High TP2 MRD had poorer outcome. Future efforts should explore further de-intensification of therapy for LR pts and incorporation of immunotherapy to improve outcome and decrease toxicity, especially for pts with HR features.
DISCLOSURES
Lynda M. Vrooman, MD: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.