2026 ASH®
Annual Meeting & Exposition December 12-15, 2026 ▪ New Orleans, Louisiana

Paper Details

Abstracts, authors, affiliations, and disclosures.

Monday, December 14, 2026
04:30 p.m. - 06:00 p.m.
MCCNO - 265-268
Treatment Considerations, Combination Therapy, Biological Therapies, Bispecific Antibody Therapy, (CAR)-T Cell Therapies, Non-Biological Therapies, Chemotherapy, Diseases, Lymphoid Malignancies, Lymphoid Leukemias, Measurable Residual Disease, ALL, Research, Clinical Research, Clinical Trials, Study Population, Human, Pediatric
PAPER

1000 Blinatumomab reduces risk of relapse and improves overall survival in NGS MRD negative BCR::ABL1 negative precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in randomized patients on the E1910 Phase III trial

Keith W. Pratz, MD, Zhuoxin Sun2, Ryan J. Mattison, MD3, Elisabeth M Paietta4, Charles G. Mullighan, MBBS (Hons), MSc, MD5, Kathryn G. Roberts, PhD6, Xiaoming Zhong, PhD7, Ruth G Tatevossian8, Sujuan Jia9, Yanming Zhang10, Janis Racevskis, PhD11, Cheryl L. Willman12, Matthew Joseph Wieduwilt, MD, PhD13, Michaela Liedtke, MD14, Julie Bergeron, MD15, Hillard M Lazarus16, Daniel Arber17, Brent L. Wood, PhD, MD18, Jacob Rowe19, Shira Dinner, MD20, Noelle Frey, MD, MSCE21, Steven Gore, MD22, Nikolai Podoltsev Podoltsev, MD, PhD23, Bhavana Bhatnagar, DO24, Ehab Atallah, MD25, Geoffrey L. Uy, MD26, Deepa Jeyakumar, MD27, Tara L. Lin, MD28, Shejal Patel, DO29, Michelle Elliott30, Anjali Sunder Advani, MD31, Daniel J DeAngelo, MD, PhD32, Dimitrios Tzachanis33, Pankit Vachhani, MD34, Rupali Roy Roy Bhave, MD35, Yasser Aboud Mourad36, Paul J. Shami, MD37, Maria R. Baer, MD38, Adam Asch39, Kristen O'Dwyer, MD40, Aric Hall, MD41, Richard F. Little, MD42, Harry P. Erba, MD43, Richard Stone, MD44, Martin Tallman, MD45, Selina Luger, MD, FRCPC46, Mark R. Litzow, MD47
1 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
2 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
3 University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, New York, United States
4 Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
5 St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
6 St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
7 St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
8 St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
9 St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
10 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
11 Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
12 University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
13 Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina, United States
14 Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, California, United States
15 Hospital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
16 Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
17 University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
18 Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
19 Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
20 Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States
21 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
22 National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
23 Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
24 West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
25 Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
26 Washington University School Of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
27 University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
28 University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
29 Virginia Commonwealth University/ Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia, United States
30 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
31 Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
32 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
33 University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States
34 University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
35 Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina, United States
36 University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
37 University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
38 University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
39 University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
40 University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, United States
41 University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
42 National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
43 Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
44 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
45 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
46 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
47 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Introduction: The ECOG-ACRIN E1910 clinical trial evaluated the effect of blinatumomab and chemotherapy (blin) when compared to chemotherapy alone (chemo) on relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in adults with BCR::ABL1-negative precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) in remission.  The addition of blin in patients (pts) with no evidence of flow cytometry-based (Flow) measurable residual disease (MRDf) after intensification (course 3) of E1910 therapy significantly improved both RFS and OS, leading to FDA approval of blin in adults with newly diagnosed B-ALL (Litzow et al, NEJM 2024;391:320) in remission. MRDf-negativity was defined as <0.01% leukemic cells in bone marrow prior to randomization. We examined associations between levels of MRD measured by antigen receptor sequencing (clonoSEQ) in MRDf-negative patients and RFS/OS in the blin versus chemo-treated patients.

Methods: ClonoSEQ was performed for bone marrow samples at baseline and pre-randomization for 176 of the 224 pts (78.6%) who had achieved MRDf negativity. Analytic sensitivity (limit of detection, LOD) was 1 cell per million (10-6). The effects of molecular MRD (MRDm) on OS and RFS at thresholds of 10-4, 10-5 and 10-6 were analyzed. Samples with analyzed DNA equivalent to less than 1 million cells were considered indeterminate at 10-6 (or 10-5 if less than 500,000 cells) and deemed negative at those levels if no residual dominant clonal sequence was detected. Genomic subtypes were determined as described in the primary manuscript. Estimates of RFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of RFS and OS between treatment arms was conducted using the two-sided log-rank test. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results: MRDm analysis identified a median of 3 (range 1-10) trackable distinct sequences in 176 baseline samples, the number of which varied by B-ALL genomic subtype. MRDm was successfully measured in MRDf-negative pre-randomization samples for 85/112 and 91/112 pts who received blin and chemo, respectively. At a median follow up of 53.7 months, 58.0% of pts (102/176) were MRDm negative (MRDm-neg) at LOD of 10-6 of which 26.5% (13/49) chemo treated and 9.43% (5/53) blin treated patients relapsed or died. Of MRDm-positive pts (MRDm-pos) at 10-6, 50% (21/42) of chemo treated pts and 25% (8/32) of blin-treated pts relapsed or died. Of those who were MRDm-pos at 10-5, 50% of chemo-treated pts (9/18) and 18.8% of blin-treated pts relapsed or died (3/16). At the 10-4 MRDm-pos level 66.6% (6/9) of chemo and 50% (2/4) of blin-treated pts relapsed or died. OS (HR 0.31, 95% CI (0.10,0.98), P=0.046) and RFS (HR 0.33 (0.12,0.91), P=0.033) were superior in MRDm-neg pts treated with blin when compared to chemo. OS (HR 0.31 (0.12,0.76), P=0.011) and RFS (HR 0.37 (0.17,0.85), P=0.018) were superior in pts who were MRDm-pos at 10-6 treated with blin when compared to chemo.  Stratifying by genomic subtype, 49.3% (33/67) of patients with high-risk genomic subtypes were MRDm-negative 63.0% (51/81) of patients with low/intermediate-risk subtypes.  RFS in high-risk MRDm-neg pts was superior with blin treatment (HR 0.14 (0.03,0.70), P=0.016).  In low/intermediate risk MRDm-neg pts RFS was not statistically different (HR 0.21(0.02,1.82) P=0.16) comparing blin and chemo treated patients. 

Conclusions: In the E1910 trial, MRDm predicted relapse risk in pts who were MRDf-negative. In the presence of quantifiable MRDm to 10-6, blin treatment was associated with a reduced risk of relapse and prolonged OS compared to chemo. In MRDm-negative patients, blin significantly improved RFS and OS when compared to chemo. These data indicate that there is no level of MRDm negativity that eliminates the risk of relapse or eliminates the clinical utility of blin in consolidation. Overall, these results confirm the benefit of blin consolidation in MRD negative patients measured by flow cytometry or molecular testing.

Keith W. Pratz, MD: Kura Oncology - Research Funding; AbbVie - Research Funding; AbbVie - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Immunogen - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Astellas - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony)