2026 ASH®
Annual Meeting & Exposition December 12-15, 2026 ▪ New Orleans, Louisiana

Paper Details

Abstracts, authors, affiliations, and disclosures.

Sunday, December 13, 2026
12:00 p.m. - 01:30 p.m.
MCCNO - New Orleans Theatre C
Treatment Considerations, Biological Therapies, Chimeric Antigen Receptor, (CAR)-T Cell Therapies, Non-Biological Therapies, Radiation Therapy, Adverse Events, Clinical Practice (Health Services and Quality), Patient Safety, Diseases, Infectious Diseases, Viral, Lymphoid Malignancies, Lymphomas, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, B Cell Lymphoma, Aggressive Lymphoma, Research, Clinical Research, Clinical Trials, Real-World Evidence, Registries, Study Population, Human, Adult
PAPER

616 Primary analysis of efficacy and safety of zamtocabtagene autoleucel, a tandem CD20/CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Results from the Phase 2 DALY II USA study

Nirav N. Shah, MD, MS, Richard Thomas Maziarz, MD2, Patrick Johnston, MD, PhD3, Javier L. Munoz, MD, MBA4, Nathan Denlinger, DO, MS5, Miguel-Angel Perales, MD6, Iris Isufi, MD7, Matthew McKinney, MD8, Matthew L. Ulrickson, MD9, Reem Karmali, MD10, Farrukh T Awan, M.D.M.S.,M.B.A.11, Sunil Abhyankar, MD12, Yuliya Linhares, MD13, Michael Chu, MD, FRCPC14, Nancy Hardy, MD15, Monalisa Ghosh, MD16, Yazan Samhouri, MD17, Lauren Shea, MD18, Marek Ancukiewicz, PhD19, Dorota Klysz, PhD20, Madhavi Nallewar21, Kimberly C Coleman, RN22, Esther Eromosele, MD23, Sabrina Holley, MD, PhD24, Kevin Christmas, PhD25, Naira Ohanjanian Namagerdi, MD26, Remi Kaleta, MD27, Jessica Foglesong, MD28, Johanna Theruvath, MD29, Anna Wijatyk, MD30, Caron Jacobson, MD, MMSc31, David Miklos, MD, PhD32
1 Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
2 Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
3 Mayo-Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
4 Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
5 The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
6 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
7 Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
8 Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
9 Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona, United States
10 Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States
11 UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
12 University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
13 Herbert Wertheim Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida; Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
14 Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
15 National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
16 Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
17 Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center,, Gilbert, Arizona, United States
18 University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
19 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
20 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
21 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
22 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
23 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
24 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
25 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
26 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
27 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
28 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
29 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
30 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
31 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
32 Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States

Introduction:

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Although commercially available CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapies have improved outcomes for relapsed/refractory (r/r) DLBCL, prolonged manufacturing times in the context of rapidly progressive disease and target antigen loss remain ongoing challenges. Zamtocabtagene autoleucel (zamto-cel; MB-CART2019.1) is a tandem CD20/CD19-directed fresh CAR T-cell therapy designed to mitigate antigen escape while enabling rapid treatment through fresh product delivery and automated manufacturing. Zamto-cel is currently being evaluated in DALY II USA (NCT04792489), a multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase 2 study. Here, we report the primary efficacy and safety for patients (pts) with r/r DLBCL, including secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL).

Methods:

Adult pts with r/r DLBCL after ≥2 prior lines of therapy or SCNSL after ≥1 prior line of therapy, were eligible. Enrolled pts received a single dose of zamto-cel at 2.5 × 106 CAR T cells/kg manufactured using the CliniMACS Prodigy® (Miltenyi Biotec) closed, automated platform with a 14-day vein-to-vein time. Unique to this product, lymphodepletion is initiated during manufacturing to facilitate the fresh infusion. The primary objective was objective response rate (ORR) based on best overall response; secondary objectives included safety and additional efficacy measures. Responses were assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) per Lugano 2014 classification.

Results:

As of the data cutoff, 110 pts had received a fresh, conforming dose of zamto-cel (104 DLBCL; 6 SCNSL). Among the total 134 leukapheresed pts, only 5 (3.7%) did not receive an infusion. Seven pts received out-of-specification product and 9 received cryopreserved product to allow for comorbidity management. All pts had at least 9 months of follow-up from CAR T-cell infusion, with a median follow-up of approximately 24 months.

The median age was 64.5 years (range, 25-85), and 37 pts (33.6%) were female.  Most pts received zamto-cel as 3L (74.5%), 18.2% as 4L, and 7.3% as >5L (ASCT not counted as a separate line of therapy); 26.4% of pts received prior ASCT. The study enrolled a high-risk population: 71.8% of pts were refractory to their most recent therapy, 53.6% had LDH >1x ULN, and 52% had ≥2 extranodal lesions. Bridging chemotherapy was not permitted on study. Consistent with the rapid 14-day vein-to-vein manufacturing time, only 15 pts (13.6%) required bridging treatment with corticosteroids and/or radiotherapy.

The ORR by IRC per Lugano 2014 criteria was 80.0% (88/110; 95% CI, 71-87), including a CR rate of 63.6% (70/110; 95% CI, 54-73); 16.4% of pts achieved a best response of PR and 14.5% had PD. Responses were durable, with median DOR not reached with an estimated 1-year DOR of 57%. Median PFS was 12.2 months (95% CI, 6-NE), with an estimated 1-year PFS of 52%; median OS was not reached, with an estimated 1-year OS 79%. Efficacy results were similar in all leukapheresed pts.

Overall, 45/110 pts (40.9%) had a serious adverse event (SAE), including 28 pts (25.5%) with a treatment-related SAE. There were no infusion-related reactions or T-cell malignancies. CRS occurred in 61 pts (55.5%), with only 1 gr ≥3 event (0.9%), and ICANS occurred in 18 pts (16.4%), including 2 gr ≥3 events (1.8%). Gr ≥3 infections occurred in 16.4% of pts, and gr ≥3 MAS/IEC-HS/HLH in 1.8%.

Among 42 pts with tumor biopsies available at disease progression, the majority maintained CD19 and CD20 expression relative to baseline. Loss of both CD19 and CD20 was observed in 2 tumors, while isolated loss of CD19 and CD20 occurred in 2 and 1 tumors, respectively. All others retained baseline target antigens.

Conclusion:

This primary analysis of the pivotal DALY II USA study represents the first completed phase 2 study of a tandem CD20/CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy in aggressive B-cell lymphoma. With a median of 2 years of follow-up, we demonstrated that zamto-cel provides durable clinical benefit with a favorable safety profile in pts with r/r DLBCL and SCNSL who had received ≥2 prior lines of treatment. As a fresh infused CAR T-cell therapy, zamto-cel was administered with a short vein-to-vein time with a low leukapheresis-to-infusion attrition rate. The low frequency of dual CD19/CD20 antigen loss at relapse demonstrates a key advantage of dual-antigen targeting in an era of sequential targeted therapies.

Nirav N. Shah, MD, MS: Nurix, Gilead-Kite, BMS-Juno, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Lilly Oncology, Incyte, AbbVie, BeoNE, Kite, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Tundra, Adaptive Biotechnologies - Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Tundra Therapeutics - Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Nurix, Gilead-Kite, BMS-Juno, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Lilly Oncology, Incyte, AbbVie, BeoNE, Kite, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Tundra, Adaptive Biotechnologies - Honoraria; Nurix, Gilead-Kite, BMS-Juno, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Lilly Oncology, Incyte, AbbVie, BeoNE, Kite, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Tundra, Adaptive Biotechnologies - Research Funding; Miltenyi Biomedicine - Research Funding; Lilly Oncology - Research Funding; Incyte - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); BMS-Juno - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Legend - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); AstraZeneca - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Genentech - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Lilly Oncology - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); BeOne - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Nurix, Gilead-Kite, BMS-Juno, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Lilly Oncology, Incyte, AbbVie, BeoNE, Kite, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Tundra, Adaptive Biotechnologies - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Miltenyi Biomedicine - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Genmab - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Abbvie - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony)