AUTHORS
Patrick Johnston, MD, PhD, David Miklos, MD, PhD2, Neel Gupta, MD3, Nathan Denlinger, DO, MS4, Richard Thomas Maziarz, MD5, Farrukh T Awan, M.D.M.S.,M.B.A.6, Michael Chu, MD, FRCPC7, Nirav N. Shah, MD, MS8, Nancy Hardy, MD9, Matthew McKinney, MD10, Amelia Langston, MD11, Sunil Abhyankar, MD12, Marek Ancukiewicz, PhD13, Dorota Klysz, PhD14, Madhavi Nallewar15, Kimberly C Coleman, RN16, Esther Eromosele, MD17, Sabrina Holley, MD, PhD18, Kevin Christmas, PhD19, Naira Ohanjanian Namagerdi, MD20, Remi Kaleta, MD21, Jessica Foglesong, MD22, Johanna Theruvath, MD23, Anna Wijatyk, MD24, Lakshmi Nayak, MD25, Caron Jacobson, MD, MMSc26
AFFILIATIONS
1 Mayo-Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2 Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
3 Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
4 The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
5 Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
6 UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
7 Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
8 Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
9 National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
10 Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
11 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
12 University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
13 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
14 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
15 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
16 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
17 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
18 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
19 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
20 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
21 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
22 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
23 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
24 Miltenyi Biomedicine Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
25 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
26 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
ABSTRACT
Introduction
Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma associated with poor clinical outcomes and a high unmet medical need. Although CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell lymphomas, patients (pts) with PCNSL have been historically excluded from prospective registration trials because of concerns regarding neurotoxicity, resulting in limited clinical data with CAR-T therapy in this population. Zamtocabtagene autoleucel (zamto-cel; MB-CART2019.1) is a tandem CD20/CD19- directed fresh CAR T-cell therapy being developed for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma. A dedicated cohort of pts with r/r PCNSL was evaluated as part of the DALY II USA clinical trial (NCT04792489), an ongoing prospective Phase 2 study of zamto-cel. Here, we report efficacy and safety outcomes for pts from this cohort.
Methods
Adult pts with r/r PCNSL after ≥1 prior line of therapy were eligible. Enrolled pts received a single dose of zamto-cel at 2.5×106 CAR T cells/kg manufactured using the CliniMACS Prodigy® (Miltenyi Biotec) closed, automated platform with a 14-day vein-to-vein time and infused as a fresh product. Lymphodepletion was initiated during manufacturing to facilitate fresh infusion. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), defined as a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Responses were assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) according to the International Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Collaborative Group (IPCG) response criteria.
Results
As of the 15 January 2026 data cutoff, 21 pts with r/r PCNSL have been enrolled, with 17 pts who received the target fresh dose of zamto-cel and had at least 6 months of follow-up after CAR T-cell infusion; these pts had a median follow-up of 15.2 months. The median within this population age was 64.0 years (range, 33-80), and 7 pts (41%) were female. The cohort represented a high-risk population, with 14 pts (82%) refractory to their last line of therapy. Excluding prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), pts received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy: 1 line in 6 pts (35%), 2 lines in 5 pts (29%), and 3 lines in 6 pts (35%). All pts had previously received methotrexate, either as monotherapy or in combination, and 7 pts (41.2%) had undergone prior ASCT. Manufacturing of a fresh zamto-cel product was successful in 100% of production runs; 2 pts received cryopreserved product to accommodate comorbidity management.
The ORR by IRC was 70.6% (12/17; 95% CI, 44-90), including a CR rate of 41% (7/17; 95% CI, 18-67). A best response of PR was achieved in 5 pts (29%), while 3 pts (18%) had progressive disease. The median DOR was 8.4 months (95% CI, 2.8-not estimable); median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI, 2.9-12.4), and median OS was 14.3 months, with an estimated 12-month OS rate of 71%.
Treatment with zamto-cel was well tolerated in the PCNSL cohort. Overall, 12/17 pts (71%) experienced a serious adverse event (SAE), including 8 pts (47%) with treatment-related SAEs. There were no treatment-related deaths or T-cell malignancies. No Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was observed. Grade 1-2 CRS occurred in 11 pts (65%), and Grade 1-2 ICANS occurred in 4 pts (24%). Grade ≥3 infections occurred in 1 pt (6%). Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic syndrome was not observed.
Conclusions
In this prospective Phase 2 study, zamto-cel demonstrated encouraging clinical activity and a favorable safety profile in pts with r/r PCNSL, a population historically underrepresented in CAR T-cell studies because of concerns regarding neurotoxicity. Within this high-risk population, treatment resulted in durable responses and encouraging survival outcomes, with no Grade ≥3 CRS or ICANS observed. Together with successful fresh manufacturing and a14-day vein-to-vein time, these findings demonstrate the potential of tandem CD20/CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy for pts with r/r PCNSL, a population with high unmet need.
DISCLOSURES
Patrick Johnston, MD, PhD: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.