2026 ASH®
Annual Meeting & Exposition December 12-15, 2026 ▪ New Orleans, Louisiana

Paper Details

Abstracts, authors, affiliations, and disclosures.

Monday, December 14, 2026
06:00 p.m. - 08:00 p.m.
MCCNO - Hall F
Technology and Procedures, Pathology, Treatment Considerations, Combination Therapy, Supportive Care, Therapy Sequence, Biological Therapies, Transplantation, Checkpoint Inhibitor, Monoclonal Antibody Therapy, Non-Biological Therapies, Anticoagulant Drugs, Chemotherapy, Adverse Events, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Generative AI, Natural Language Processing, Clinical Practice (Health Services and Quality), Clinical Guidelines, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Diseases, Lymphoid Malignancies, Lymphoid Leukemias, Lymphomas, LGL, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, T Cell Lymphoma, Aggressive Lymphoma, Research, Clinical Research, Clinical Trials, Epidemiology, Health Outcomes Research, Real-World Evidence, Registries, Survivorship, Study Population, Human, Adult
PAPER

5355 Ruxolitinib plus duvelisib demonstrates encouraging efficacy in T-prolymphocytic leukemia

Alison Moskowitz, MD, Eric Jacobsen, MD2, Jonathan Harry Schatz, MD3, Nivetha Ganesan, MPH4, Tiffany Chang5, Theresa Davey, PA6, Helen Hancock, NP7, Marcel Smith8, Alicia Assini, NP9, Jamie Plevy, NP10, Angela Gibaldi, RN11, Mackenzie Maloney, RN12, Sinead Dunn, RN13, Robert Stuver, MD14, Jasmine Zain, M.D.15, Jae H Park, MD16, Paola Ghione, MD, MS17, Zachary Epstein-Peterson, MD18, Kimon Argyropoulos, MD, PhD19, Katherine Lopez20, Katie Ksanznak21, Sumaiya Afzal22, Khishigzaya Jacobs23, Suviasini Patel24, Maria Salas25, Sarima Subzwari, MS26, Marwah Jihad27, Jenna Mahns28, Ellie Casper, MS, DPT29, Natasha Galasso, MSW30, Heiko Schoder, MD31, Ahmet Dogan, MD32, Santosha Vardhana, MD, PhD33, Steven Horwitz, M.D.34
1 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
2 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
3 Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, United States
4 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
5 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
6 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
7 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
8 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
9 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
10 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
11 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
12 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
13 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
14 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
15 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
16 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
17 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
18 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
19 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
20 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
21 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
22 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
23 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
24 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
25 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
26 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
27 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
28 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
29 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
30 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
31 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
32 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
33 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
34 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States

Introduction: Both duvelisib (duv), a phosphoinositive-3-kinase (PI3K)-γδ inhibitor, and ruxolitinib (rux), a Janus kinase (JAK)-1/2 inhibitor, are effective agents for peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) and cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL). In prior studies, PI3K signaling activation predicted for resistance to rux while JAK/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling activation predicted for resistance to duv-based therapy (Moskowitz, et al.  Blood 2021; Horwitz, et al. Nature Medicine 2024).  Building on these observations, we conducted a phase I study assessing dual-targeting of JAK and PI3K with rux plus duv for PTCL and CTCL. Maximum tolerated dose was determined to be rux 20mg po BID plus duv 25mg PO BID and among a total of 49 patients (pts) enrolled, ORR and CR rate were 41% and 24%, respectively (Moskowitz, et al. ASH 2024).  Particularly encouraging activity was observed among 5 pts with T-prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL), of whom 3 (60%) experienced a response, including 2 with prolonged responses lasting 24 and 36 mos. To confirm the preliminary efficacy observed, we expanded the study to enroll an additional 10 pts with T-PLL. Reported here are results for all pts with T-PLL.

Methods: This is an investigator-initiated multi-center study for pts with PTCL or CTCL that included an expansion cohort for pts with T-PLL. A sample size of 15 pts was chosen to allow, according to the Wilson score method, for a narrower 95% C.I of 48-89%, assuming similar efficacy is observed. Pts with treatment naïve or relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) T-PLL were eligible.  Treatment consisted of rux 20mg PO BID plus duv 25mg PO BID until progression or intolerance. Prophylaxis against herpes zoster and pneumocystis pneumonia (PJP) was required. The primary objective was to estimate the ORR (combined rates of complete response and partial response) and disease control rate (DCR; combined rates of complete response, partial response, and stable disease [SD] lasting at least 6 mos) using the global response score for T-PLL.

Results: 14 pts enrolled and 1 pt is currently in screening. Among 14 pts treated, median age at enrollment was 66 years (range, 63-87), 57% were female, 79% were white, 14% black, and 7% unknown. Median number of prior therapies was 0 (range 0-6); 8 pts were treatment-naïve. Two pts previously underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant and 1 previously underwent autologous stem cell transplant.  

Treatment-related grade 3 drug-related adverse events included neutropenia (7% G3, 14% G4), anemia (7% G3), lung infection (7% G3), and hypertension (7% G3).

Thirteen pts are evaluable for response (1 is too early). Five pts achieved objective response, all partial, leading to an ORR of 37% (95% C.I 14-68%). Three pts had stable disease (SD) of whom 2 had SD > 6 months (11.1 mos and 23.6 mos), leading to a disease control rate (DCR) of 54% (95% C.I. 25%-81%).

Median time to best response was 1.8 mos (1.8-10.1 mos). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 12.9 (95% C.I 1.8-NR) mos and median duration of response (DOR) was 17.7 (4.7-NR) mos. Among the 8 treatment-naïve pts, ORR was 63%, DCR 75%, and median PFS and DOR were 17.9 (9-NR) and 17.7 (4.7-NR) mos, respectively. In contrast, among 5 previously treated pts, 1 pt with 1 prior line of therapy (alemtuzumab) had SD >6 mos (23.6 mos) while the rest experienced no response to rux/duv.     

Genetic studies showed that 7 pts had disease with activating JAK3-mutations (including 1 pt with a JAK1 mutation), 2 had STAT5B-mutations, and 1 had a JAK1-mutation. Among pts with JAK3-muations, 2 (29%) achieved PR and 4 (57%) achieved disease control. Of the 2 pts with STAT5B mutations, both achieved PR. No responses were seen among the 2 pts with JAK1 mutations.

Conclusion:  Rux 20mg BID plus duv 25mg BID has encouraging efficacy in T-PLL with ORR of 37% and DCR of 54%. All responses were partial, but they were durable with median DOR of 17.7 mos. Higher efficacy was observed among treatment-naïve pts (ORR of 63% and DCR of 75%) as well as pts whose disease harbored JAK3 or STAT5B mutations. The toxicity profile was manageable with low rates of typical PI3Ki-related toxicities such as hepatitis, rash, or colitis, which were possibly diminished by ruxolitinib. In conclusion, rux/duv represents a durable, well tolerated option for pts with T-PLL who are not eligible for standard treatment with alemtuzumab followed by allogeneic stem cell transplant. 

Alison Moskowitz, MD: Pfizer - Honoraria; Takeda - Honoraria; Merck - Honoraria; Incyte - Research Funding; SecuraBio - Research Funding; Merck - Research Funding; BMS - Research Funding; Pfizer - Research Funding