AUTHORS
Everett Meyer, MD, PhD, Amandeep Salhotra, MD2, Arpita Gandhi, M.D., M.S.3, Jeremy Pantin, MD4, Sagar S Patel, MD5, Rasmus T Hoeg, MD6, Alexandra Gomez-Arteaga, MD7, Rawan Faramand, MD8, Roni Tamari, MD9, Ned K. Waller, MD,PhD10, Satyajit Kosuri, MD11, Antonio M. Jimenez Jimenez, MD12, Jennifer Holter-Chakrabarty, MD13, Bhagirathbhai Dholaria, MD, FACP14, Yi-Bin A Chen, MD15, Betty Hamilton, MD16, John Magenau Jr, MD17, Alireza Eghtedar, MD18, Joshua Murray19, Anna Pavlova, MD, PhD20, Nate B. Fernhoff, PhD21, J. Scott McClellan, MD, PhD22, Ai Li23, Robert Negrin, MD24, Caspian Oliai, MD25
AFFILIATIONS
1 Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
2 City of Hope, Duarte, California, United States
3 Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
4 Sarah Cannon Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program at TriStar, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
5 University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
6 University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, United States
7 Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
8 Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
9 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
10 Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
11 University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
12 Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
13 University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
14 Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
15 Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
16 Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
17 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
18 Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Denver, Colorado, United States
19 Orca Bio, Menlo Park, California, United States
20 Orca Bio, Menlo Park, California, United States
21 Orca Bio, Menlo Park, California, United States
22 Orca Bio, Menlo Park, California, United States
23 Orca Bio, Menlo Park, California, United States
24 Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
25 UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a critical barrier to the long-term success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), driving late organ toxicity, prolonged immunosuppression, and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Pharmacological prophylaxis strategies utilize broad, non-selective immunosuppression which can delay immune reconstitution, cause infection, and worsen regimen related toxicities. Because these toxicities escalate with age, conditioning intensity is frequently de-escalated for older patients (pts), trading disease control for tolerability. Allogeneic regulatory T cell immunotherapy with HSPC and T cells-vldq (Orca-T) that leverages highly purified, regulatory T cells to control alloreactive immune responses with single agent tacrolimus (Tac). The Ph3 Precision-T study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating superior survival free from moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD (cGFS) with Orca-T compared to a control arm with tacrolimus/methotrexate (Tac/MTX) (Meyer et al.Blood 2026). Here we report the 2-year follow-up, including updated overall survival (OS) from the randomized Ph3 Precision-T trial (NCT05316701).
Methods: Eligible adults (aged 18-65), with an 8/8 HLA-matched donor undergoing myeloablative alloHSCT for acute leukemia in complete remission or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (≤10% BM blasts) were randomized 1:1 to receive either Orca-T with single-agent Tac or unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cells plus Tac/MTX (control arm). Data reported is from a post-hoc analysis that follows 2 years from last pt enrollment. The following transplant outcomes were evaluated in the overall population, OS, cGFS, cGVHD (moderate-to-severe), relapse free survival (RFS) and NRM. To assess impact of age within myeloablative eligible pts, a subgroup analysis was conducted in pts ≥44 years.
Results: A total of 89 Orca-T and 94 control arm pts were treated; key demographics and baseline characteristics were previously reported (Meyer, et al.Blood 2026). Orca-T was manufactured in a centralized GMP facility, distributed, and infused successfully at 19 centers across the U.S. with a vein-to-vein time of <72 hours.
At the data cut-off, OS at 1-year was 92% (95% CI: 84.0-96.1) in Orca-T vs 77% (95% CI: 67.2-84.5) in the control arm (p =.147). The 2-year estimated OS was 84% (95% CI: 73.7- 89.9) in Orca-T vs 73% (95% CI: 62.9-81.3) in the control arm (p=.109). Orca-T pts had a 2-year estimated cGFS of 68% (95% CI: 55.1-77.2) vs 17% (95% CI: 9.5-26.7) in the control arm (p<.00001). The 2-year estimated cumulative incidence of moderate-to-severe cGVHD was 17% (95% CI: 9.6-25.3) in Orca-T and 58% (95% CI: 46.8-67.3) in the control arm (p<.00001). Two year estimated RFS was 72% (95% CI: 61.1-80.2) and 66% (95% CI: 55.3-75.0) in Orca-T and the control arm, respectively (p=.285). The 2-year estimated cumulative incidence of NRM was 6% (95% CI: 2.2-12.2) and 17% (95% CI: 10.1-25.6) in Orca-T and the control arm, respectively (p = .025; post-hoc). Relapse rates at 2-years were 22% with Orca-T vs 17% in the control arm (p=.468). Safety results with longer follow-up showed no new signals as compared to previous reports. In a subgroup analysis of post-transplant outcomes in pts ≥ the median study age of 44 years (Orca-T [n=55] vs control arm [n=60]), estimated 2-year OS was 82% with Orca-T vs 58% in the control arm (p=.009). At 2 years post-transplant, NRM was 6% with Orca-T vs 28% in the control arm (p=.005), and the relapse rate was 18% and 18% (p=.974), respectively.
Conclusions: At the 2-year timepoint, Orca-T maintained a durable cGVHD-free survival advantage (2-year cGFS 68% vs 17%), together with low moderate-to-severe cGVHD, low NRM, and a favorable safety profile vs the control arm. Two-year relapse rates were similar between study arms. In the overall population, OS point estimates were numerically higher for Orca-T at 1 and 2 years but did not reach statistical significance. As age is an important determinant for conditioning intensity, a subgroup analysis of pts in the older age range for myeloablative eligibility ( ≥44 y/o), demonstrated favorable improvements in OS and NRM with MAC-Orca-T (nominal p-values < 0.05). Collectively, these results establish Orca-T as a graft-engineering approach that delivers durable protection from GVHD without compromising relapse control with a potential benefit in older pts.
DISCLOSURES
Everett Meyer, MD, PhD: Orca Bio, Inc. - Research Funding