AFFILIATIONS
1 FBRI, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
2 FBRI, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
3 FBRI, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
4 FBRI, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
5 FBRI, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
6 Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
7 Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
8 Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States
9 Weill Cornell Medicine/ New York Presbyterian-Hospital, New York, New York, United States
10 Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
11 Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Northside Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
12 City of Hope, Duarte, California, United States
13 Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Immunotherapy, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
14 Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
15 Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States
16 University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
17 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
18 University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
19 Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
20 Taussig Cancer Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
21 The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
22 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
23 Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
24 Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
25 Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
26 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
27 Taussig Cancer Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
28 University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
29 University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
30 Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
31 Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
32 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Pleasanton, California, United States
33 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Pleasanton, California, United States
34 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Pleasanton, California, United States
35 Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, United States
36 Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, United States
37 Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, United States
38 Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, United States
39 Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, United States
40 Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, United States
41 Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, United States
42 Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, United States
43 Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, United States
44 Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, United States
45 Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, United States
46 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
47 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
48 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
49 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
50 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
51 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
52 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
53 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
54 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
55 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
56 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
57 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
58 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
59 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
60 Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
61 FBRI, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
KMT2A alterations are common in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and define biologically distinct subsets with either rearrangements (KMT2Ar) or partial tandem duplications (KMT2A-PTD). Pre-analytical factors and treatment may impact KMT2A transcript levels, limiting reliable measurable residual disease (MRD) quantification. Given the relevance of these targets in drug development and clinical management, as part of the FNIH Biomarkers Consortium for MRD in AML, we developed a tumor-informed approach to design personalized DNA-based six-channel multiplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays that detect and track patient-specific KMT2A alteration alongside up to four co-occurring leukemia-associated variants. We then applied this method to samples collected on a prospective clinical protocol, MEASURE (NCT05224661), conducted at 18 major US cancer centers for adults with AML in complete remission (CR) undergoing first allogeneic transplant (HCT).
Methods:
We developed and analytically validated six-channel multiplex ddPCR assays in KMT2Ar AML cell lines and patient samples, establishing limits of blank (LOB) and detection (LOD) per CLSI EP17-A2 guidelines. Structural variant (SV) assays used breakpoint-flanking primer/probe strategies; small variants (SNV/indel) used dark-probe designs.
Whole genome sequencing of diagnostic material (Dx, 59-300X) and paired CR blood (24-89X) identified MEASURE participants with KMT2Ar or KMT2A-PTD. Beyond KMT2A, up to 4 targets were selected per patient, prioritizing oncogenic over passenger variants and SV/InDel over SNV; the sixth channel was reserved for the reference AGO1. To maximize genome sampling, 1ug of genomic DNA from CR blood collected 5-79 days before HCT was distributed across five 200ng wells for MRD testing. Each patient-specific ddPCR test included positive controls (two Dx dilutions 0.1%, 0.05%), one healthy donor (HD) negative control and no template control.
Oncogenic variants were positive (pos) when supported by ≥3 pos droplets above the assay-specific LOB; passenger variants were pos only when signals exceeded the lowest Dx dilution. Surrogate VAF was the ratio of target to reference concentrations. For relapsed but MRD-neg patients, longitudinal samples were analyzed when available.
Results:
After initial development using 7 KMT2Ar AML cell lines, validation was expanded to serial dilutions of 5 AML patient samples using optimized probe design and expanded dark probe use. LOB was 0; median LODs were 0.03% for SVs (range 0.02-0.05%) and 0.06% for small variants (range 0.01-0.09%).
Personalized ddPCR assays were successfully designed for all 27 patients with KMT2Ar and 21 of 34 patients with KMT2A-PTD (limited by repetitive region complexity). Targets per patient ranged 3-5 (median 5); 57 (25%) SVs, 168 (75%) small variants. All Dx dilutions were pos with VAF ranging 0.002%-2.5% (median 0.14%); all HD controls were neg.
The 48 patients tested had median age 56yr (19-77yr); median follow-up time post-HCT was 18mo (11-36mo). 9 relapsed post-HCT. Pre-HCT multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) as clinical standard of care for MRD testing was available for 47 (98%) patients.
Of 27 patients with KMT2Ar, 4 relapsed (15%); pre-HCT MFC was neg in all. Pre-HCT ddPCR for KMT2Ar was pos for 9 patients (33%) and identified all 3 who relapsed within 1yr post-HCT with sensitivity (sens) 100%, specificity (spec) 75%, positive predictive value (PPV) 33%, negative predictive value (NPV) 100% for 1yr relapse. A fourth patient relapsed at 13mo; serial post-HCT ddPCR detected conversion to pos 5 weeks prior to relapse.
Of 21 patients with KMT2A-PTD, 5 relapsed (24%), all within 1yr; pre-HCT MFC was pos in 2 patients and they both relapsed. Pre-HCT ddPCR for KMT2A-PTD was pos for 17 patients (81%) and identified 4/5 relapsed patients with sens 80%, spec 19%, PPV 24%, NPV 75%. Among the 13 KMT2A-PTD MRD-pos patients who did not relapse, all had at least one co-detected AML-associated variant, suggesting true clonal persistence rather than technical artifact.
Conclusions:
Detection of KMT2Ar persistence in pre-HCT remission blood by personalized DNA-based multiplex ddPCR was associated with post-HCT relapse. KMT2A-PTD, while more commonly detected in pre-HCT CR blood, may represent a lower value AML MRD marker. Co-detected oncogenic/passenger variants and serial post-HCT monitoring data will be presented at the meeting.