AUTHORS
Rawan Shraim, PhD, Yi Hsiao, PhD2, Petri Polonen, PhD3, Lahari Uppuluri, PhD4, Haoting Chen, MSc5, Rosalie Chu6, Kara L. Davis, D.O.7, Nicholas J. Day, PhD8, Meenakshi Devidas, PhD9, Saravana Mohan Dhanasekaran10, Caroline Diorio, MD11, Kimberly Dunsmore, MD12, Tori Fuller13, Marina A. Gritsenko14, Andrew Hughes15, Stephen P. Hunger, MD16, Lingyun Ji, PhD17, Mignon L. Loh, MD18, Alexey Nesvizhskii, PhD19, Haley Newman, MD, MSCE20, Ferro Nguyen, MSc21, Rishika Pasula22, Karen R. Rabin, MD, PhD23, Elizabeth A. Raetz, MD24, Rachel E. Rau, MD25, Prabhat Sharma26, Chenwei Wang, PhD27, Stuart S. Winter, MD28, Brent L. Wood, PhD, MD29, Xu Zhang, PhD30, Jasmin Bavarva, PhD31, Emily Boja, PhD32, Jun J. Yang, PhD33, Marcin P. Cieslik, PhD34, Tao Liu35, Charles G. Mullighan, MBBS (Hons), MSc, MD36, David T. Teachey, MD37
AFFILIATIONS
1 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
2 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
3 St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
4 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
5 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
6 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, United States
7 Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
8 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, United States
9 St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
10 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
11 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
12 University of Virginia Children's Hospital, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
13 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
14 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, United States
15 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
16 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
17 University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
18 Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States
19 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
20 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
21 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
22 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
23 University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
24 New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
25 Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States
26 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
27 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
28 The University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
29 Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
30 National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States
31 National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States
32 National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States
33 St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
34 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
35 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, United States
36 St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
37 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
ABSTRACT
Background: Relapsed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) has a poor prognosis, with survival <30%. Identifying novel therapies to prevent and salvage relapse is critical. Target selection and prioritization is complicated by somatic tumor biologic heterogeneity and a paucity of targets aberrantly expressed or dysregulated in T-ALL blasts and not healthy cells. Much of T-ALL profiling has been RNA-based, which can be misleading for target evaluation due to disconnect between RNA-protein levels. Defining RNA–protein concordance is essential to determine which targets can be inferred from transcriptomic data and which require protein-level assessment for biomarker-driven precision medicine.
Methods: We previously performed comprehensive genomic profiling of 1,309 pediatric and young adult T-ALL cases treated on the Children’s Oncology Group AALL0434 international phase 3 clinical trial, defining 15 major molecular subtypes with distinct genomic profiles (PMID: 39143224). To understand RNA-protein relationships, which targetable pathways are dysregulated in different genomic subtypes, and identify novel targets for immunotherapy, we performed mass spectrometry (MS) proteomics on samples from 114 genomically characterized AALL0434 T-ALL patients that included global proteomics, glycosylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquination. Global proteomics data was generated using data-independent acquisition (DIA) and tandem-mass tag (TMT) MS methods. We also generated DIA MS data from pediatric healthy thymi (n=6) and bone marrow (n=3).
Results: We quantified ~10,000 proteins by DIA and ~11,000 by TMT, of which 8,279 and 10,491, respectively, were detected in at least 50% of samples. Median gene-wise RNA–protein correlation was relatively low (DIA, ρ=0.16; TMT, ρ=0.20), demonstrating RNA expression is not uniformly predictive of protein abundance in T-ALL. Nevertheless, 687 DIA-quantified and 1,023 TMT-quantified proteins were at least moderately correlated (ρ>=0.5). Membrane associated proteins represented 26% and 23% of these proteins in DIA and TMT, respectively. Clinically actionable targets with strong RNA–protein concordance (TMT and DIA ρ≥0.5; P<0.001) included LCK, BCL2, CD7, CD38, CD5, and PLK1 supporting the use of RNA-based assays as surrogates for protein abundance for these targets. A small number of proteins (n=16) including GTF2H3, previously linked to T-ALL, had negative RNA-protein correlation (TMT and DIA); mechanistic studies are underway to understand the negative correlation.
RNA expression did not consistently capture genomic alteration-associated differences in RUNX1, PTEN, NOTCH1, and CCND3. Blasts with NOTCH1 and CCND3 activating alterations had significantly higher protein abundance than unaltered cases (P<0.001), despite no corresponding differences in RNA, highlighting the importance of proteomic evaluation. Proteomic profiling identified maturation-associated targetable dependencies. BCL2 protein abundance, a biomarker of venetoclax sensitivity, was enriched in developmentally immature T-ALL (ETP-like and BCL11B) compared to more mature double-positive T-ALL (TLX1, NKX2-1, and TAL1 DP and αβ-like). In contrast, LCK protein abundance, a biomarker of dasatinib sensitivity, was enriched in the double-positive T-ALL group compared to immature T-ALL (Wilcoxon BH-adjusted P<0.001 for both).
We used ImmunoTar (PMID: 39932005) to identify novel potential targets for immunotherapy that were abundant on T-ALL blasts but had low to no protein abundance in healthy hematopoietic cells. These targets include LILRB2 (CD85d), a member of the leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor (LIR), and CD96 (TACTILE), a type I transmembrane glycoprotein belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily. Flow cytometry validation is ongoing.
Conclusions: Proteogenomic profiling of T-ALL identifies clinically actionable targets that can be inferred from RNA expression and novel targets to be further explored for immunotherapy. This profiling reveals alteration- and subtype-associated dependencies that require direct protein-level assessment. These findings support integrated proteogenomic profiling to refine therapeutic target discovery, biomarker development, and immunotherapy prioritization in pediatric T-ALL. RS, YH, PP & MC, TL, CM, DT equally contributed.
DISCLOSURES
Rawan Shraim, PhD: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.