AUTHORS
Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD, John F. Seymour, MBBS, PhD2, Wojciech Jurczak, MD, PhD3, Andrew Aw4, Malgorzata Wach5, Arpád Illés6, Alessandra Tedeschi7, Carolyn Owen, MD8, Alan Skarbnik, MD9, Daniel Lysak, MD, PhD10, Ki-Seong Eom, MD, PhD11, Martin Simkovic, MD12, Miguel Arturo A. Pavlovsky, MD13, Arnon Philip Kater, MD, PhD14, Barbara Eichhorst, MD15, Jose Angel Hernandez Rivas16, Guillaume Cartron, MD17, Catherine Thieblemont, MD, PhD18, Batul Suterwala19, Carol Moreno20, Ellie John21, Kara Miller, MS22, Paolo Ghia, MD, PhD23
AFFILIATIONS
1 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
2 Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
3 Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Kraków, Poland
4 University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
5 Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
6 Department of Hematology, Institute of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
7 ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Niguarda Cancer Center, Milano, Italy
8 University of Calgary and Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Canada
9 Novant Health Cancer Institute, Charlotte, United States
10 Fakultní Nemocnice Plzen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
11 Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea, Rep. of South
12 Hradec Králové, University Hospital and Charles University in Prague, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
13 FUNDALEU, Clinical Research Center, Buenos Aires, Argentina
14 Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, on behalf of HOVON, Netherlands
15 University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
16 Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
17 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier UMR5535, Montpellier, France
18 Université Paris Cité, H?pital Saint-Louis, Assistance publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hemato-oncologie, Paris, France
19 AstraZeneca, South San Francisco, United States
20 AstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain
21 AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
22 AstraZeneca, South San Francisco, United States
23 IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
ABSTRACT
Background: The phase 3 AMPLIFY trial (NCT03836261) evaluated a fixed-duration (FD) Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor plus BCL-2 inhibitor ± obinutuzumab combinations in treatment (tx)-naive (TN) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) without del(17p) or TP53 mutation. At the prespecified interim analysis, the study met its primary endpoint of independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) for acalabrutinib + venetoclax (AV) vs chemoimmunotherapy (CIT; fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab or bendamustine and rituximab); AVO also significantly improved PFS versus CIT (Brown et al, NEJM 2025). At a median follow-up of 5 y, we present prespecified secondary endpoint analyses: overall survival (OS), time to next tx (TTNT), and safety. Investigator-assessed PFS will be presented at the meeting. A final analysis will report IRC-assessed primary and secondary endpoints with longer follow-up.
Methods: Patients (pts) with TN CLL were randomized to AV (A 100 mg BID, cycles [C] 1–14; V ramp-up to 400 mg QD, C3–14), AV+obinutuzumab (AV+O, C2–7), or CIT (C1–6). OS was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. TTNT was defined as time from randomization to initiation of subsequent anti-CLL tx or death, whichever occurred first. All time-to-event analyses used a Cox proportional-hazards model. As the prespecified testing procedure was completed, all current analyses are descriptive. Serious adverse events (SAEs; tx-emergent and beyond) are reported. Data cutoff was April 30, 2026.
Results: A total of 867 pts were randomized (AV, n=291; AVO, n=286; CIT, n=290). At a median follow-up of 62.8 mo (range 0–85), AV continued to show OS benefit vs CIT (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.30–0.72); AVO OS HR was 0.71 (0.48–1.06). The estimated OS rates at 60 mo were 90.9% for AV, 85.9% for AVO, and 80.7% for CIT. In a prespecified sensitivity analysis censoring for COVID-19 deaths, the OS HR (95% CI) vs CIT was 0.53 (0.30–0.91) for AV and 0.50 (0.28–0.87) for AVO. Subgroup analyses (without censoring) by IGHV status showed OS benefit for AV vs CIT in both unmutated IGHV (uIGHV) (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.35–0.99) and mutated IGHV (mIGHV) (0.29; 0.11–0.65); in AVO, values were 0.64 (0.38–1.05) in uIGHV and 0.86 (0.45–1.61) in mIGHV.
TTNT events occurred in 112 (38.5%), 72 (25.2%), and 120 (41.4%) pts in the AV, AVO, and CIT arms, respectively. Median (95% CI) TTNT for AV (77.1 mo [67.3, not calculable (NC)]; HR 0.67 [0.52, 0.87]) and AVO (not reached [79.4, NC]; HR 0.43 [0.32, 0.57]) were longer vs CIT (68.8 mo [57.2, NC]). The estimated cumulative incidence of initiating next line of tx (with censoring for COVID-19 death) at 60 mo was 28.5%, 13.9%, and 41.0% for AV, AVO, and CIT, respectively (HR [95% CI] vs CIT: 0.73 [0.55–0.96] for AV; 0.32 [0.22–0.45] for AVO). Among uIGHV, TTNT benefit was observed for AV (0.69; 0.51–0.93) and AVO (0.35; 0.24–0.50) vs CIT; among mIGHV, values were 0.68 (0.41–1.14) and 0.65 (0.38–1.09), respectively, vs CIT.
Among 834 pts in the safety population, fatal tx-emergent SAEs occurred in 10 (3.4%), 17 (6.0%), and 9 (3.5%) pts in the AV, AVO, and CIT arms, respectively; COVID-19–related events were the most common causes. Fatal SAEs beyond the tx-emergent period occurred in 7 (2.4%), 15 (5.3%), and 22 (8.5%) pts, with infections (predominantly COVID-19) being the most common cause across arms. For SAEs tx-emergent and beyond: infection (any grade [G]) occurred in 42 (14.4%), 87 (30.6%), and 54 (20.8%) pts; infection (G≥3) occurred in 38 (13.1%), 79 (27.8%), and 52 (20.1%) pts. Serious cardiac events (G≥3) occurred in 2 (0.7%), 7 (2.5%), and 3 (1.2%) pts; G5 cardiac events occurred in 1 pt in each arm. Second primary malignancies (SPMs; excluding non-melanoma skin) (any grade) occurred in 18 (6.2%), 16 (5.6%), and 13 (5.0%) pts.
Conclusions: After 5 y of follow-up, AV continued to show an OS benefit vs CIT at both the interim and present analyses across mIGHV and uIGHV subgroups. Notably, both AV and AVO were associated with prolonged TTNT vs CIT, supporting durable disease control and a delay in needing subsequent therapy. No new safety signals were observed, with low incidences of G≥3 infection and G≥3 cardiac events in AV and similar rates of SPMs across arms. AMPLIFY continues to demonstrate efficacy and safety of FD AV regimens, including all-oral AV, for TN CLL.
DISCLOSURES
Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD: iOnctura - Research Funding; BeOne (BeiGene) - Research Funding; Nagoon Therapeutics - Research Funding; Nurix Therapeutics - Research Funding; Loxo/Lilly - Research Funding; AbbVie - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Grifols Worldwide Operations - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Galapagos NV - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Loxo/Lilly - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Magnet Biomedicine - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Acerta/AstraZeneca - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Johnson & Johnson - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Merck - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); InnoCare Pharma Inc - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); GSK - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); BeOne (BeiGene) - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Nurix Therapeutics - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); iOnctura - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony)