AUTHORS
Matthew S Davids, MD, MMSc, Ryan Jacobs, MD2, Wojciech Jurczak, MD, PhD3, Martin Simkovic, MD4, Arpád Illés5, John M. Burke, MD6, Alan Skarbnik, MD7, Jana Mihalyova, MD8, Tadeusz Robak, MD9, Craig Portell, MD10, Wojciech Janowski11, Paul M. Barr, MD12, Allison Winter, MD13, Stephen Opat14, Daniel Lysak, MD, PhD15, Miguel Arguello De Tomas16, Caroline Dartigeas, MD17, Brad S. Kahl, MD18, Krzysztof Giannopoulos, MD, PhD19, Jiefen Munley20, Ellie John21, Rick Hermann22, Anthony Mato, MD23, Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH24, Jeff Sharman, MD25
AFFILIATIONS
1 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
2 Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
3 Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Krakow, Poland
4 University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
5 University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
6 Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, Colorado, United States
7 Novant Health Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
8 University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava, Czech Republic, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
9 Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
10 University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
11 Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, Australia
12 Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States
13 Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
14 Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
15 Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
16 Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
17 Tours University Hospital, Tours, France
18 Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
19 Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
20 AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
21 AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
22 AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
23 AstraZeneca, New York, New York, United States
24 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States
25 Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center, Eugene, Oregon, United States
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Fixed-duration acalabrutinib + venetoclax (AV) was superior to chemoimmunotherapy in patients (pts) with treatment (tx)-naive (TN) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) without del(17p) or TP53 mutation (TP53m) in the phase 3 AMPLIFY trial (NCT03836261), establishing it as a new standard of care option. Recently, CLL17 (NCT04608318) showed that a BTKi/BCL-2i combination (ibrutinib + V) had lower rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) yet similar progression-free survival (PFS) vs V + obinutuzumab (VO). We report results from a prespecified interim analysis (IA) of MAJIC, which directly compares AV to VO in a broad pt population with TN CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), including pts with TP53 aberrations, with both regimens utilizing MRD-guided tx duration of either 1 or 2 y (1Y, 2Y).
Methods: MAJIC (NCT05057494) is an ongoing, randomized, open-label, global phase 3 trial in pts with TN CLL/SLL aged ≥18 y including pts with del(17p) and/or TP53m. Pts were randomized (stratified by del(17p)/TP53m status, IGHV status, and age ≥65 y) 1:1 to oral AV (A 100 mg BID cycles [C] 1–14 or 24; V 400 mg QD C3–14 or 24 with standard 5-wk dose ramp-up initiated C3 day [D] 1) or VO (oral V 400 mg QD C1–12 or 24 with standard 5-wk dose ramp-up initiated C1D22; intravenous O C1–6 by standard dosing). Tx was stopped after ~1Y of V (end C14 AV or C12 VO) for at least partial response (PR) and uMRD in peripheral blood (PB) at <10-5 (uMRD5) by clonoSEQ; otherwise, V (VO arm) and AV continued through C24 (2Y). The IA was performed after all pts completed the required study tx. The event-driven primary endpoint analysis of PFS will be reported when mature. The descriptive secondary endpoint analyses include investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR; defined as best overall response of complete response [CR]/PR) and CR rate, uMRD rate (PB by clonoSEQ) and safety. Response was based on 2018 iwCLL criteria and adverse events (AEs) were graded according to CTCAE v5.
Results: Among 607 randomized pts (AV, n=306; VO, n=301), baseline characteristics were well balanced. Median age was 66 y (55% ≥65 y; range 34–86 y), 66% were male, 10% had del(17p)/TP53m, and 61% had unmutated IGHV (uIGHV). Median tx duration was 22.1 mo (AV) and 11.5 mo (VO). Tx completion rates at 1Y due to meeting clinical response and uMRD criteria were 22.0% (AV) and 81.8% (VO).
ORRs were 91.2% for AV and 90.7% for VO; CR/CR with incomplete marrow recovery rates (CRRs) were 19.3% for AV and 23.3% for VO. In pts with del(17p)/TP53m, ORRs (CRRs) were 86.7% (26.7%) for AV and 92.9% (17.9%) for VO. With uIGHV, ORRs (CRRs) were 93.6% (19.3%) for AV and 90.2% (21.7%) for VO. uMRD5 (uMRD4) rates in AV vs VO were 23.5% (38.2%) vs 83.1% (87.0%) at 1Y and 38.2% (51.6%) vs 54.2% (69.1%) at 2Y. With del(17p)/TP53m, uMRD5 (uMRD4) rates were 20.0% (33.3%) for AV and 67.9% (82.1%) for VO at 1Y and 33.3% (40.0%) and 42.9% (57.1%) at 2Y. With uIGHV, uMRD5 (uMRD4) rates were 27.3% (45.5%) for AV and 82.6% (87.0%) for VO at 1Y and 43.3% (57.8%) and 54.9% (65.8%) at 2Y.
Among 601 treated pts (AV, n=305; VO, n=296), premature tx discontinuation occurred in 14.8% (AV) and 10.8% (VO), most commonly due to AEs (7.9% and 5.4%). Grade (G) 3+ AEs occurred in 55.7% (AV) and 67.6% (VO), most commonly neutropenia/decreased neutrophil count (33.1% and 46.3%) and thrombocytopenia/decreased platelet count (3.3% and 14.5%). Serious AEs occurred in 23.0% (AV) and 26.0% (VO). Any-G atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias were 2.6% and 0.7% (AV) and 1.7% and 0.3% (VO). G3+ cardiac events and hemorrhage were 1.6% and 1.6% (AV), and 2.4% and 0.7% (VO). G3+ infections were 8.2% (AV) and 10.5% (VO). Any-G tumor lysis syndrome were 0.7% (AV) and 2.0% (VO) and any-G infusion-related reaction in 54.4% (VO only).
Conclusion: This IA of MAJIC shows similar ORR/CRR for AV and VO in an all-comer CLL/SLL population. With VO, uMRD rates were higher at 1Y and most pts completed tx at that time, whereas uMRD rates with AV increased at 2Y. MRD-guided, all-oral AV offers an infusion-free, time-limited regimen, with an overall favorable safety profile and similar cardiac and infection AE rates as VO, despite longer tx duration for the majority of pts. Though longer follow-up and mature PFS are needed to appropriately compare these regimens, initial data suggest MRD-guided AV may offer an effective, safe, and convenient option for TN CLL/SLL, including pts with higher-risk genetics.
DISCLOSURES
Matthew S Davids, MD, MMSc: AstraZeneca - Honoraria; AbbVie - Honoraria; Janssen - Honoraria; Ascentage Pharma - Honoraria; BMS - Honoraria; Nuvalent - Honoraria; BeOne Medicines - Honoraria; Schroedinger - Honoraria; Merck - Honoraria; Genentech - Honoraria; Genmab - Honoraria; Eli Lilly - Honoraria; Ascentage Pharma - Research Funding; AstraZeneca - Research Funding; Janssen - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); BeOne Medicines - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Genmab - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); BMS - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Ascentage Pharma - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Genentech - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Merck - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Schroedinger - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Eli Lilly - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Nuvalent - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); AbbVie - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); AstraZeneca - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony)