AUTHORS
Nirav N. Shah, MD, MS, Zulfa Omer, MD2, Sebastian Grosicki, MD PhD3, Michal Kwiatek, MD, PhD4, Talha Munir, MBBS, MRCP , PhD5, Alexey V. Danilov, MD, PhD6, Francesco Forconi, MD, PhD, DM, FRCPath7, Laura Samples, MD8, Mary Gleeson, MD9, Alvaro Alencar, MD10, Graham P. Collins, BM11, Jane Robertson, MD12, Jonathon B. Cohen, MD, MS13, Danielle Brander, MD14, Allison Winter, MD15, William G. Wierda, MD, PhD16, Dima El-Sharkawi, PhD, MBBS, FRCPath, MA, MRCP17, Krzysztof Giannopoulos, MD, PhD18, Karan Dixit, MD19, Leigh Beveridge, MBBS, FRACP20, Wojciech Jurczak, MD, PhD21
AFFILIATIONS
1 Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
2 University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
3 Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
4 AidPort Hospital, Skórzewo (Poznan), Poland
5 Saint James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
6 City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, United States
7 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
8 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Volunteer Services, Seattle, Washington, United States
9 Guys & Saint Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
10 University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
11 Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
12 The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
13 Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
14 Duke Cancer Institute, Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Durham, North Carolina, United States
15 Cleveland Clinic Foundation House, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
16 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
17 The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
18 Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
19 Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States
20 Nurix Therapeutics, Inc., Brisbane, California, United States
21 Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow, Poland
ABSTRACT
Background: Although Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition has been a successful treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), the emergence of BTK inhibitor (BTKi) resistance mutations and kinase-independent signaling via the scaffolding function of BTK highlight a need for alternative treatments. Bexobrutideg (NX-5948) is a highly selective, orally administered small molecule degrader that causes the removal of wild-type and mutant forms of BTK through ubiquitination by the cereblon E3 ligase complex and subsequent proteasomal degradation. We report new and updated Phase 1a/b efficacy and safety data for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL with no CNS involvement who were assigned to receive bexobrutideg 600 mg once daily, with a focus on patients with prior covalent BTKi (cBTKi) exposure.
Methods: NX-5948-301 (NCT05131022) is a first-in-human, Phase 1a/1b trial of the BTK degrader bexobrutideg in advanced B-cell malignancies including CLL, consisting of 3+3 dose-escalation (Phase 1a) followed by dose-expansion (Phase 1b) cohorts. We present safety data for patients with R/R CLL and efficacy data for patients with prior cBTKi exposure assigned to receive bexobrutideg 600 mg, the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D).
Results: As of April 1, 2026, 79 patients with R/R CLL without CNS involvement were treated with assigned bexobrutideg 600 mg (safety analysis set). The median age was 69 (range 41–83) years; 64.6% of patients were male; median prior lines of treatment 3.0 (range 1–15); 69 (87.3%) patients had prior BTKi exposure, including 66 (83.5%) with prior cBTKi exposure. With a median treatment duration of 8.0 (range 0.03–24.4) months, bexobrutideg 600 mg was well tolerated, consistent with previous reports. Reasons for discontinuation (n=24) were: radiographic progression (n=8); clinical progression (n=3); adverse event (n=7); death (n=1, not deemed treatment related); physician decision (n=3); and patient withdrawal of consent (n=2). Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 75 (94.9%) patients (75.9% treatment related). Grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported in 42 (53.2%) patients (26.6% treatment related). Serious TEAEs were reported in 24 (30.4%) patients (7.6% treatment related). The most frequent TEAEs were purpura/contusion (35.4%; no Grade ≥3), petechiae (31.6%; no Grade ≥3), neutropenia (29.1%; Grade ≥3 22.8%), and diarrhea (25.3%; no Grade ≥3). Three deaths were observed (pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma), all classified as unrelated to bexobrutideg. The incidence of atrial fibrillation, Grade ≥3 fungal infections, and elevated amylase/lipase was low.
The efficacy dataset comprised patients with prior cBTKi exposure assigned to bexobrutideg 600 mg. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were similar to the safety analysis set and 43 patients remain on treatment. In the 61 response-evaluable patients with prior cBTKi exposure, median follow-up was 13.2 (range 2.6–24.4) months; the objective response rate (ORR) was 85.2% (2 CRs, 43 PRs and 7 PRs with lymphocytosis). The 18-month duration of response (DoR) event-free rate was 64.1% (95% CI 41.5–79.9%; median DoR not reached). The 18-month median progression-free survival (PFS) event-free rate was 52.9% (95% CI 33.3–69.1%; median PFS not reached). High ORRs were observed among BCL2 inhibitor (BCL2i)-naïve patients (n=31; ORR 83.9%, 95% CI 66.3–94.5%)?, double (cBTKi and BCL2i)-exposed (excluding triple-exposed) patients (n=21; ORR 95.2%, 95% CI 76.2–99.9%), and triple (cBTKi, non-covalent BTKi and BCL2i)-exposed patients (n=9; ORR 66.7%, 95% CI 29.9–92.5%). An update on the BTKi-naïve population and efficacy data in patients with high-risk molecular features will be presented.
Conclusions: The RP2D of bexobrutideg (600 mg) was well tolerated in R/R CLL. High ORRs were observed in patients with prior cBTKi exposure, including BCL2i-naïve, double-exposed, and triple-exposed patients. Ongoing evaluations include additional Phase 1 cohorts (BTKi-naïve, CNS involvement, and non-covalent BTKi-exposed) along with the pivotal Phase 2 DAYBreak CLL-201 and Phase 3 DAYBreak CLL-306 trials.
DISCLOSURES
Nirav N. Shah, MD, MS: Nurix, Gilead-Kite, BMS-Juno, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Lilly Oncology, Incyte, AbbVie, BeoNE, Kite, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Tundra, Adaptive Biotechnologies - Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Tundra Therapeutics - Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Nurix, Gilead-Kite, BMS-Juno, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Lilly Oncology, Incyte, AbbVie, BeoNE, Kite, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Tundra, Adaptive Biotechnologies - Honoraria; Nurix, Gilead-Kite, BMS-Juno, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Lilly Oncology, Incyte, AbbVie, BeoNE, Kite, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Tundra, Adaptive Biotechnologies - Research Funding; Miltenyi Biomedicine - Research Funding; Lilly Oncology - Research Funding; Incyte - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); BMS-Juno - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Legend - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); AstraZeneca - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Genentech - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Lilly Oncology - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); BeOne - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Nurix, Gilead-Kite, BMS-Juno, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Lilly Oncology, Incyte, AbbVie, BeoNE, Kite, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Tundra, Adaptive Biotechnologies - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Miltenyi Biomedicine - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Genmab - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony); Abbvie - Consultancy (Includes expert testimony)